Study: No Need to Stop Warfarin for Pacemaker, ICD Surgery

Advertising Changes After Drug Switch to Over-the-Counter
Advertising Changes After Drug Switch to Over-the-Counter
For patients undergoing pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator surgery, the incidence of clinically significant pocket-device hematoma is significantly reduced with continued warfarin therapy vs. heparin bridging.

(HealthDay News) – For patients undergoing pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) surgery, the incidence of clinically significant pocket-device hematoma is significantly reduced with continued warfarin therapy vs. heparin bridging, according to a study published online May 9 in the New England Journal of Medicine to coincide with presentation at the annual meeting of the Heart Rhythm Society, held from May 8–11 in Denver.

David H. Birnie, MD, from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute in Canada, and colleagues randomized patients with a ≥5% annual risk of thromboembolic events to continued warfarin treatment (n=343) or bridging therapy with heparin (n=338) at the time of pacemaker or ICD surgery.

The trial was terminated after the second pre-specified interim analysis. The researchers found that clinically significant device-pocket hematoma occurred in 3.5% and 16% of the continued-warfarin and heparin-bridging groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.19). There was no between-group difference in major surgical and thromboembolic complications, both of which were rare.

“Patients who underwent surgery without interruption of warfarin therapy had a markedly reduced incidence of clinically significant device-pocket hematoma, as compared with those who received bridging therapy with heparin,” the authors write.

Abstract
Full Text
More Information