Benefits, Harms of CMS Coverage of Lung Cancer Screening
(HealthDay News) — The benefits and potential harms of low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer are discussed in relation to the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS) evaluation of screening coverage. The two clinical reviews were published online October 13 in JAMA Internal Medicine.
Douglas E. Wood, MD, from the University of Washington in Seattle, discusses the importance of lung cancer screening for Medicare beneficiaries. Noting that 70% of lung cancers occur in patients aged ≥65 years, the author suggests that CMS should cover low-dose CT. Concerns, including false-positive findings that lead to further testing and procedures, overdiagnosis, harms associated with surgery, and costs of follow-up, can be mitigated by clear criteria for screening high-risk patients, disciplined management of abnormalities, and high-quality multidisciplinary care.
In a second article, Steven H. Woolf, MD, MPH, from the Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, and colleagues discuss the strength of evidence for low-dose CT lung cancer screening. The authors note that the magnitude of benefit from routine screening is unclear, with estimates based on a single study and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force simulation models. False-positive results, anxiety, exposure to radiation, diagnostic work-ups, and resulting complications are potential harms. It remains uncertain whether screening would result in net benefit or net harm.
"The CMS owes it to Medicare beneficiaries to reach a timely decision about the coverage of lung cancer screening with low-dose CT based on medical evidence, not lobbying or politics," writes the author of an accompanying editorial.
Two panels, which Wood chairs and serves, receive financial support from the health care industry.