Generic Three-Pill HIV Regimen Could Result in Big Savings

Share this article:
Generic Three-Pill HIV Regimen Could Result in Big Savings
Generic Three-Pill HIV Regimen Could Result in Big Savings

(HealthDay News) – The use of first-line, generic-based antiretroviral (ART) HIV treatment in the United States could potentially save almost $1 billion in the first year of implementation, according to a study published in the Jan. 15 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH, from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and colleagues conducted a mathematical simulation study for HIV-infected individuals in the United States to assess the clinical effect, costs, and cost-effectiveness of a three-pill (efavirenz, lamivudine, tenofovir), generic-based regimen compared to a branded, co-formulated regimen. The potential national savings in the first year of a switch to generic-based ART were projected.

The researchers found that generic-based ART had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $21,100 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), compared with no ART. Branded ART increased lifetime costs by $42,500, vs. generic ART, and per-person survival gains by 0.37 QALYs, for an ICER of $114,800/QALY. If all eligible U.S. patients started or switched to generic-based ART, the estimated first-year savings would be $920 million. Branded ART ICERs were estimated to be greater than $100,000/QALY based on plausible assumptions about generic-based ART efficacy and costs.

"Compared with a slightly less effective generic-based regimen, the cost-effectiveness of first-line branded ART exceeds $100,000/QALY," the authors write. "Generic-based ART in the United States could yield substantial budgetary savings to HIV programs."

One author disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

Share this article:

Related Resources